Allowed
The State of Maharashtra v. Mahammad Jamal Nadaf and Ors.
Bombay HCAPPP/5/2009
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 75 OF 2009
| The State of Maharashtra. Versus |
... | Applicant. | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mohammad Jamal Nadaf & Ors. | ... | .... | Respondents. |
Ms. U. V. Kejriwal, APP for the Applicant. Mr. Kedar S. Patil for the Respondents.
CORAM : BILAL NAZKI and ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED : 3RD FEBRUARY, 2009.
P. C.:
Heard learned Counsel for the parties. Considering the averments
made in the application, this application for condonation of delay is allowed.
Sd/-
(BILAL NAZKI, J.) Sd/-
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the current criminal application is condonable.
The State of Maharashtra
Mohammad Jamal Nadaf & Ors.
BILAL NAZKI
ANOOP V. MOHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court