Criminal Writ Petition where the petitioner claimed to have been released; the court held the petition became infructuous and dismissed it without further orders.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ssm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 68 OF 2009
Vishwanath Dattoba Hargude...Petitioner.
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors....Respondents.
Mr.M.Surve i/by Mr. Madhav Jamdar for the Petitioner.
Ms.U.V.Kejariwal, APP for the State.
CORAM : BILALNAZKI &
ANOOP V.MOHTA, JJ.
DATED : 2ND FEBRUARY, 2009.
P.C.
It is submitted by the learned counsel
appearing for the Petitioner that the Petitioner
has already been released and no grievance remains.
The Petition has become infructuous and is
accordingly dismissed.
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
(BILAL NAZKI, J.)
Vishwanath Dattoba Hargude
The State of Maharashtra
Bilalnazki
Anoop V. Mohota
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court