Court dismissed an application seeking a stay on Sessions Court proceedings. The Chief Public Prosecutor requested the main revision to be heard finally and chargedelayed until September 2, 2009.
The criminal application was dismissed with no stay granted on proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 441 OF 2009 IN REVISION APPLICATION NO. 354 OF 2009
Ganesh Amrika Jaiswal.. Applicant.
vs.
The State of Maharashtra..Respondent.
==========
Ms.Mallika Ingale, Advocate for applicant.
Mr.Y.S.Shinde, APP for respondent.
==========
CORAM : SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J.
DATED : 26TH AUGUST, 2009.
PC :-
1This application is filed for the stay of further
proceedings before the Sessions Court in view of
admission of revision application filed against the
order rejecting prayer for discharge.
2The learned APP submits that instead of staying
proceedings, the main revision application, itself be
taken up for final hearing. The hearing of revision
application be expedited. The same be placed on board
for final hearing on 2nd September 2009.
.. 2..
3The learned APP states that until that date,
charge would not be framed.
4In view of this order, Criminal application No.441
of 2009 is dismissed.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant a stay on further proceedings before the Sessions Court pending the final hearing of the revision.
Whether the main revision application should be taken up for immediate final hearing instead of staying proceedings.
Ganesh Amrika Jaiswal
The State of Maharashtra
R.P. Sondurbaldota
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court