Dismissed
Anand Uttam Chavan and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCAPPLN/2765/2009
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2765 OF 2009
Anand Uttam Chavan Arjun Krishna Jagtap ..... ..... ...Applicants V/s The State of Maharashtra ..... ..... ...Respondent. None for the applicants. Mr.J.P.Yagnik, APP for the Respondent.
CORAM: A.P.DESHPANDE, J. 10th August, 2009.
PC:
Learned counsel for the applicant was absent in the first session. Hence matter was kept back and called out in the second sessions. Counsel for the applicant is yet again absent. Learned APP makes a statement on instructions from IO that without approaching the Sessions Court the present application for anticipatory bail has been directly filed in the High Court without moving the Sessions Court. On account of absence of the counsel, application is dismissed for non prosecution.
10.8.2009.
Anand Uttam Chavan Arjun Krishna Jagtap
The State of Maharashtra
A.P.Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court