This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1822 OF 2009
Shailesh Vijay Gadade ..... ..... ...Applicant V/s The State of Maharashtra ..... ..... ...Respondent.
Mr.O.A.Siddiqui and Mr.Rajendra Rathod Adv. for the applicant. Mr.J.P.Yagnik, Adv. for the Respondent.
CORAM: A.P.DESHPANDE, J. 10th August, 2009.
PC:
My attention is invited to the order passed by Justice V.M. Kanade dated 30.7.09 on an application moved by co-accused for bail whereby learned Judge after rejecting the bail application had issued a direction to expedite the trial and decide the case within a period of three months. In view of said direction I am informed that the prosecution is expeditiously taken up and about 40 witnesses are already examined. Learned APP submits that only 3 to 4 witnesses are yet to be examined. In that view of the matter learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the application. Permission granted. Application stands disposed of.
10.8.2009.
Shailesh Vijay Gadade
The State of Maharashtra
A.P. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
