In an application for suspension of sentence, the High Court examined the conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC. Holding the case not fit for suspension, the application was rejected despite the appellant pleading for bail.
Application for suspension of sentence rejected; order communicated to appellant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 871 OF 2009
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1265 OF 2007
Balu Ganpat Bhange .. Applicant. vs The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent.
Mr. Shyam Mehta for the Applicant.
Ms. A.S. Pai, APP., for the Respondent/State.
CORAM : J. N. PATEL &
A. A. SAYED, JJ.
DATE : 9TH NOVEMBER, 2009
P.C. :
This is an application for suspension of sentence
tendered by the applicant through jail.
well the learned APP., The appellant has been tried and convicted
2
for offences punishable under Section 302, 323, 506 IPC. The appellant has been found guilty of having committed murder of Laxman Rama Pardhi by using stone. The sole witness to the incident is Salubai P.W.3.
( J. N. PATEL, J.)
( A. A. SAYED, J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the case is fit for suspension of sentence and release on bail.
Whether the evidence of the sole witness and medical officer establishes murder under Section 302 IPC.
3 provisions across 1 enactments
Balu Ganpat Bhange
The State of Maharashtra
J. N. PATEL
A. A. SAYED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
