Petitioner, a convict, filed an application to expedite hearing of his criminal appeal. The court denied priority as no grounds were made out, and disposed of the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
.. 1 ..
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1183 OF 2009 (FOR EXPEDIATE HEARING) IN APPEAL NO. 213 OF 2005
Anil Chandrakant Londhe .. Petitioner. vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent. .... Mr.A.K.Apte, for the petitioner. Mr.P.A.Pol, PP for the respondent/State. ....
CORAM : J.N. PATEL AND A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : 7th NOVEMBER 2009.
P.C.:
.. 2 ..
(J.N.PATEL, J.)
(A.A.SAYED, J.)
Anil Chandrakant Londhe
The State of Maharashtra
J.N. PATEL
A.A. SAYED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
