The court condoned a delay of about 339 days in filing a criminal appeal against conviction and sentence of seven years imprisonment for offences under IPC Section 397 and the Arms Act, admitting the appeal.
Condonation of delay of 339 days allowed; criminal appeal admitted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.397 OF 2009 JIN CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST.)NO.340 OF 2009
Rajesh @ Foujan Vijaykumar Gupta @ Samaydin Choudhary .. Applicant V/s.
The State of Maharashtra .. Respondents
Mr.Vinod Wagh i/b.Ms.Anjali Iyer for the Applicant. Mrs.M.H.Mhatre, A.P.P.for the State.
CORAM : A.R.JOSHI, J.
DATED : APRIL 17TH, 2009.
P.C.
It is the application for condonation of delay of about 339 days in filing the Appeal against conviction for the offence punishable under section 397 of Indian Penal Code and Section 4 read with section 25 of the Arms Act. Seven years imprisonment was ordered on the applicant accused. He is in jail. For the reasons mentioned in the application for condonation of delay, the same is allowed.
2. Appeal is admitted.
(A.R. JOSHI, J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether condonation of delay for filing criminal appeal against conviction for offences under section 397 IPC and Arms Act is permissible.
Whether the criminal appeal against conviction and sentence deserves admission.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Rajesh @ Foujan Vijaykumar Gupta @ Samaydin Choudhary
The State of Maharashtra
A.R. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
