Idbi Bank Ltd. and Anr. v. Maytas Infra Ltd. and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL (LODGING) NO. 93 OF 2009 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. _____ OF 2009 IN SUIT (LODGING) NO. 356 OF 2009
IDBI Bank Limited and another
).. Appellants
Versus
MAYTAS Infra Limited and others
).. Respondents
Mr Virag Tulzapurkar a/w Mr Birendra Saraf, Mr Vikram Trivedi, Mr Sunil Tilokchandani, Mr Sachin Chandarana & Mr Durgesh Khanapurkar i/b M/s M K Ambalal & Co. for the Appellants.
Mr R A Dada, Senior Counsel, a/w Mr Chetan Kapadia, Mr Karl Shroff i/b Ashu Thakur for Defendant No.1.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. DATED : 13TH FEBRUARY 2009
P.C.
We have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the Appellants. The challenge is to the order dated 9th February 2009. It
needs to be examined whether an Appeal can lie against such an order.
-2-
Be that as it may, we are even otherwise not inclined to interfere with the impugned order passed by the learned Single Judge as only notice has been issued to the Defendants returnable after two weeks. The contention raised is that there are number of Defendants and it may not be possible to serve them in the normal course. We do not see any reason to interfere. Appeal dismissed. No order as to costs.
CHIEF JUSTICE
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
IDBI Bank Limited
MAYTAS Infra Limited
SWATANTER KUMAR
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court