The appellant withdrew the appeal against an ad-interim order. The court allowed the withdrawal and left all questions raised open to be decided later.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
: 1 :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.544 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.655 OF 2009
Mr.Nilesh Laxmikant Kudalkar
...Appellant
Versus
Nilkanth Govind Wakankar & Ors. . ...Respondents
Mr.S.G.Surana for Appellant.
Mr.P.M.Gaonkar for Respondents 1 to 3.
Mrs.K.K.Sorran for Respondent No.5.
CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. DATED : AUGUST 27, 2009.
P.C. :
Appeal are left open to be decided in accordance with law.
A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.
Nilesh Laxmikant Kudalkar
Nilkanth Govind Wakankar & Ors.
A.M.KHANWILKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
