A criminal writ petition was dismissed in the absence of the parties, and the rule was discharged following a default appearance.
Petition dismissed in default. Rule discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 798 OF 2001
Dr. Gangadhar Narayan Joglekar ....Petitioner
Versus
Dr. Sharad Purushottam Pathak & Anr. ...Respondents
CORAM: A. S. OKA, J. DATED: 1st AUGUST 2008
P.C.:
None appears for the contesting parties when this petition is called out. The farad sheet shows that when this petition was called out on 9th April 2008, none appeared for both the parties.
Hence, the petition is dismissed in default. Rule is discharged.
(A.S. Oka, J).
Dr. Gangadhar Narayan Joglekar
Dr. Sharad Purushottam Pathak
A. S. Oka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
