Roshni @ Mohini Sureshlal Mulchandani v. Meera Lakmichand Mulchandani and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.303 OF 2008.
Smt. Roshni @ Mohini Sureshlal Mulchandani. ..Petitioner. versus Smt. Meera Lakmichand Mulchandani & Ors. ..Respondents.
AND
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2389 OF 2007.
Kamal Amritlal Lalwani & Ors. ..Petitioner. versus Smt. Meera Lakhimal Mulchandani & Anr. ..Respondents. ....
| Mr. P.D. Dalvi, for the Petitioner, in | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Crim.W.P.No.303/2008. | |||
| Mr. V.S.Kotwal, i/b. Ms. Mohite, for the Respon Nos. 1 to 3, in Crim.W.P.No.303/2008. |
dent | ||
| Mr. J.P. Yagnik, APP, for the Respondent -State Crim.W.P.No.303/2008. .... |
, in CORAM : A.S. OK DATE : 1ST AUG |
A, J. UST,2008. |
|
| P.C. | |||
| 1. The learned counsel app |
earing for the parties | ||
| have filed on record the |
consent terms |
duly | signed by |
| the contesting parties |
and | their | respective |
| advocates. The learned |
advocates for |
the | parties |
state that the petitions be disposed of in terms of consent terms.
| The | consent | terms | are | marked | as ’X’ |
for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| identification | and | the | same | are |
taken | on |
record.
The petitions are disposed of in terms of
consent terms.
The concerned Courts before whom the cases
referred to in clause 5 of the consent terms
are pending, shall act upon an authenticated
copy of this order.
[ A.S.OKA, J.]
Smt. Roshni @ Mohini Sureshlal Mulchandani
Smt. Meera Lakmichand Mulchandani
Kamal Amritlal Lalwani
Smt. Meera Lakhimal Mulchandani
A.S. OKA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court