A criminal writ petition was dismissed in default due to the non-appearance of the petitioner on the day enumerated for hearing, with the rule discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 210 OF 2001
Shri Ramesh V. Pal ...Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
...Respondents
None for the Petitioner. Miss P.P. Shinde, APP for the State.
CORAM: A. S. OKA, J. DATED: 1st August 2008
P.C.:
None appears for the Petitioner. On 8th July 2008 when this Petition was called out, a request was made on behalf of the Advocate on record for the Petitioner for grant of time, as the said advocate desired to apply for discharge. Accordingly, time was granted till 28th July 2008.
When this Petition is called out, none appears for the Petitioner. Hence, the petition is dismissed in default. Rule is discharged.
(A.S. Oka, J.)
Shri Ramesh V. Pal
The State of Maharashtra
A. S. Oka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
