Petitioner withdrew a writ petition asserting grievances were redressed. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 7298 OF 2008
Smt. Leelabai Kanyalal Chandwani ... Petitioner
Versus
Taluka Inspector of Land Records & Ors. Respondents
Mr. Rahul S. Kadam, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. V.S.Gokhale, AGP, for the Respondents.
CORAM: BILAL NAZKI & J.H.BHATIA,JJ
DATE: 11th December, 2008.
P.C.
1. The learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks to
withdraw the Petition as the petitioner’s grievances
have already been redressed.
2. The Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(BILAL NAZKI,J.)
2
(J.H.BHATIA,J.)
Smt. Leelabai Kanyalal Chandwani
Taluka Inspector of Land Records
Bilal Nazki
J.H. Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court