Petitioner challenged disqualification in a municipal tender for Ganesh Utsav pandals. Court found the contract was completed and events over, declaring the petition infructuous and dismissing it.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 6077 OF 2008
DIST.: THANE
Murlidhar Shankar Munde ...Petitioner
Versus
City Engineer, Bhivandi Nizampur Municipal Corporation, & Ors. ...Respondents.
Ms. Anjali S. Uthale i/by Mr. Shriram S. Kulkarni for the Petitioner Mr. Ashutosh Gole with Mr. R.S. Apte for Respondents No. 1 and 2 Mr. V.S. Masurkar, Government Pleader, for Respondent No. 6.
CORAM : B ILAL NAZKI and J.H. BHATIA, JJ. DATE : OCTOBER 16, 2008
P.C. :-
A request is made on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner for adjournment of the case.
2
respondents No. 5 and 6, to whom the contracts were given, were lower than that of the petitioner.
and is dismissed.
BILAL NAZKI, J.
J.H. BHATIA, J.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition challenging disqualification in a public tender is maintainable when the tendered event has already been completed.
Murlidhar Shankar Munde
City Engineer, Bhivandi Nizampur Municipal Corporation
Bilal Nazki
J.H. Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
