Shri Hermino Fernandes, Navelim-Goa. v. Shri Vincente Pereira and 4 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
In a two-line order, the Goa High Court dismissed a writ petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO. 595 OF 2003
Shri Hermino Fernandes, Navelim-Goa. ... Petitioner
versus
Shri Vincente Pereira and four others. ... Respondents
Ms. Winnie Coutinho, Government Advocate for Respondent No.5.
Mr. G. Shirodkar, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & N. A. BRITTO, J.
DATE : 21ST NOVEMBER, 2008.
P.C.:-
Learned Counsel for the Respondents states that the petition has
become infructuous.
Dismissed as infructuous.
CHIEF JUSTICE
JUDGE
RD
Shri Hermino Fernandes
Shri Vincente Pereira
SWATANTER KUMAR
N. A. BRITTO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court