The Court disposed of a PIL regarding the constitution of the State Human Rights Commission in Goa within three months, noting no further extension would be granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION WRIT PETITION NO.567 OF 2003
Savita Nelia Dias Sapeco, Miramar, Panaji-Goa. ... Petitioner versus The Chief Secretary, Panaji-Goa. ... Respondent
Mr. S. S. Kantak, Advocate General with A. Kamat, Additional Government Advocate for the Respondent.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & N. A. BRITTO, J. DATE : 21ST NOVEMBER, 2008.
P.C.:-
Learned Advocate General for the State submits, upon instructions, that the State Human Rights Commission under the said Act shall be constituted within three months from today.
We accept the statement.
We make it clear that no further extension will be granted.
The Commission must be started from that date.
2
Petition disposed of in view of the statement made by the learned
Advocate General.
CHIEF JUSTICE
JUDGE
RD
Savita Nelia Dias Sapeco
The Chief Secretary, Panaji-Goa
Swatanter Kumar
N. A. Britto
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
