The High Court of Bombay disposed of writ petition No. 5168 of 2008 based on a statement made by the Special Counsel for Respondent No. 2, recording that nothing survived in the petition.
Petition disposed of based on statement by Respondent No. 2的水泥 that nothing survives in the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 5168 OF 2008
Vivek Munnalal Soni..... V/s
State of Maharashtra & Ors... .
..... Petitioner
... Respondents.
Ms.Helan Mandlik i/by Mr.R.K.Mendadkar, Adv for the petitioner.
Mr.A.E.Deshmukh, Spl. Counsel for respondent No.2
CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J . & A.P.DESHPANDE, J. DATED: 11th AUGUST 2008.
PC:
Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2 submits that the application/representation of the petitioner shall be decided within two weeks from today. In view of the statement made nothing survives in the petition. Same is disposed of. Respondent to abide by the aforesaid statement. Order passed by the respondent No.2 shall be communicated to the petitioner.
CHIEF JUSTICE
A.P.DESHPANDE, J.
Vivek Munnalal Soni
State of Maharashtra
SWATANTER KUMAR
A.P.DESHPANDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
