Both parties filed consent terms stating the matter was settled. The court accepted the filing and disposed of the writ petitions and the letters patent appeal accordingly.
Writ Petitions and Letters Patent Appeal disposed of based on consent terms.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 67 OF 2008 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 865 OF 2008
Infomedia India Ltd. V/s
. .. ..... Petitioner
Sanjay C. Katke ... . ... Respondent
Mr.Sanjay Dhulupkar, Adv. for the petitioner.
Mr.Y.M.Pendse a/w Mr.M.A.Shaikh, Adv. For respondent.
CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J . & A.P.DESHPANDE, J. DATED: 11th AUGUST 2008.
PC:
Learned counsel for respective parties submit that the matter has already been settled between the parties and file consent terms in the Court today which are duly signed by respective learned counsel and their clients. Same are taken on record and marked `X' for identification. In terms of the said consent terms which would bind both the parties Writ Petition Nos.9658/2004 and 865/2008 stand disposed of. This appeal stands disposed of accordingly.
CHIEF JUSTICE
A.P.DESHPANDE, J.
Infomedia India Ltd.
Sanjay C. Katke
Swatanter Kumar
A.P. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
