Shri Jeronimo Coutinho v. Village Panchayat of Candolim
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 49…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO. 49 OF 2002
SHRI JERONIMO COUTINHO ... Petitioner Versus VILLAGE PANCHAYAT OF CANDOLIM ... Respondent
Mr. Nitin Sardessai Advocate for the respondent.
Coram:R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J.
Date:18th March, 2008
P.C.
None present for the petitioner. Heard Mr. N. Sardessai, Advocate for the respondent. The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Rule stands discharged. No order as to costs. Interim relief stands vacated.
R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J.
SMA
SHRI JERONIMO COUTINHO
VILLAGE PANCHAYAT OF CANDOLIM
R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court