cognizance of the complaints filed by the respondents in relation to the alleged blockage of access/pathway stated to have been done by the petitioner, the question of the petitioner being heard in the matter did not arise before the Lower Appellate Authority. By the order which the Lower Appellate Authority was expected to pass in the appeal filed by the respondents was in no way adverse to the interest of the petitioners nor in relation to the alleged blockage of access/pathway in question as such. The appeal, accordingly, related to the fact that the concerned Panchayat Authority had failed to take even cognizance of the complaint regarding the blockage of access/pathway which is stated to have been illegal. In this view of the matter, I don't find any illegality committed either by the Lower Authority nor there is any fraud as such played by the respondents upon the Court in non-joining the petitioners as party to the said proceedings. The petitioner cannot make grievance of alleged failure on the part of the respondents to join the petitioners as party to such proceedings without disclosing any interest of the petitioners having been affected by the order which was passed by the Lower Appellate Authority in the said proceedings. The perusal of the order which was passed by the Lower Authority on the appeal filed by the respondents apparently discloses that the Lower Appellate Authority had merely directed the Panchayat to look into the complaints filed by the respondents and nothing beyond that. Being so, there is absolutely no any case made out for the interference by this Court in the impugned
