Disposed

Maruti Ganpat Yadav v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Bombay HC4 Dec 2008WP/1151/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a writ petition for non-decision on his application under S. 28A of the Land Acquisition Act regarding compensation re-determination. The court accepted an undertaking from the A.G.P. to dispose the matter within six weeks and directed the respondents accordingly.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to dispose of the petitioner's application under S. 28A of the Land Acquisition Act within six weeks.

Maruti Ganpat Yadav Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors. — Land Acquisition | Bombay HC (2008)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶3

 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

 WRIT PETITION NO.1151 OF 2008

¶5

 Maruti Ganpat Yadav .. Petitioner.

¶6

vs.

¶7

 State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents

¶8

 Mr.S.N.Gawde i/b Mr.V.R.Kasle for the petitioner

¶9

 Mr.V.A.Sonpal, A.G.P. for respondent nos.1 to 3

¶10

CORAM: J.N. PATEL, &
 S.J. KATHAWALLA, JJ.

¶11

DATE: 4TH DECEMBER, 2008.

¶12

 P.C.

¶13

 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

¶14

 2. The petitioner is required to approach this

¶15

 court as his application under section 28A of the Land
 Acquisition Act has not been decided by the
 respondents.

¶16

 3. The petitioner filed the application under
 section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act before the
 Respondent on 13.03.01 along with all the required

¶17

¶18

 documents but the respondents have failed to take any

¶19

 decision in the matter of re-determination of
 compensation in respect of the acquisition of the land
 of the petitioner as per the decision of the reference
 court dated 31.03.1999 in L.A.R. No.91 of 1993. The
 learned A.G.P. states that the matter is under process
 and the decision would be taken within a period of 6
 weeks.

¶20

 4. We accept the statement of the learned A.G.P.
 as an undertaking to this court. Petition is therefore
 disposed of with a direction to the respondents to
 dispose of the application of the petitioner in
 accordance with law within a period of 6 weeks from the
 date of passing of the order.

¶21

 5. Ld.A.G.P. to communicate this order to the
 Special Land Acquisition Officer who is dealing with

¶22

 the matter.

¶23

(J.N. Patel, J.)

¶24

¶25

(S.J. Kathawalla, J.)

Maruti Ganpat Yadav v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Maruti Ganpat Yadav v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ajit Raosaheb Bhoite Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Zishan Erfan Khan Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Pune Zilla Sahakari Doodh Utpadak Sangh Vs Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited and Ors.

Sunil Sawant Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Bhagirathi Maruti Nemane Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Narayan Yashwant Prabalkar Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.