Disposed
Shantaram L.Naik and Anr. v. State of Goa and Ors.
Bombay HCWP/110/2002
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petition disposed of as infructuous. No substantive decision on grounds or law laid down.
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO. 110 OF 2002
SHANTARAM L.NAIK AND ANR ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF GOA AND ORS ... Respondent
Mr. V. R. Tamab, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S. S. Kantak, Advocate General with Ms. Rakhi Chodankar, Addl. Govt. Advocate for the respondent.
Coram:SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:22nd July, 2008
P.C.
The Counsel for the parties state that this petition has become infructuous. The petition is disposed of as infructuous. No order as to costs.
SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J.
N. A. BRITTO, J.
ssm.
SHANTARAM L.NAIK AND ANR
STATE OF GOA AND ORS
SWATANTER KUMAR
N. A. BRITTO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court