The High Court of Bombay at Goa disposed of Writ Petition No. 103 of 2002 as infructuous. A single-line order with no substantive reasoning was delivered by a two-judge bench.
None; Petition disposed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO. 103 OF 2002
SHRI LUIZINHO JOAQUIM FALEIRO ... Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF GOA THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY,PANAJ ... Respondent
Mr.Y. V. Nadkarni, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S. S. Kantak, Advocate General with Ms. Rakhi Chodankar, Addl. Govt. Advocate for the respondent.
Coram:SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:22nd July, 2008
P.C.
The Counsel for the parties state that this petition has become infructuous. The petition is disposed of as infructuous. No order as to costs.
SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J.
N. A. BRITTO, J.
ssm.
SHRI LUIZINHO JOAQUIM FALEIRO
THE STATE OF GOA THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY,PANAJ
SWATANTER KUMAR
N. A. BRITTO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
