The writ petition filed by Dr. Kashinath Jhalmi was declared infructuous and disposed of without orders on costs.
Order as to costs is not made.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO. 106 OF 2002
DR. KASHINATH JHALMI ... Petitioner Versus THE GOVERNOR STATE OF GOA & ORS ... Respondent
Mr. Amrut Kansar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S. S Kantak, Advocate General with Ms. R. Chodankar, Addl. Govt. Advocate for the State.
Coram:SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:22nd July, 2008
P.C.
The Counsel for the parties state that this petition has become infructuous. The petition is disposed of as infructuous. No order as to costs.
SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J.
N. A. BRITTO, J.
ssm.
DR. KASHINATH JHALMI
THE GOVERNOR STATE OF GOA
SWATANTER KUMAR
N. A. BRITTO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
