The High Court of Bombay allowed a civil application in a PIL by Applicants to be impleaded as Party Respondents in the ongoing public interest litigation without serious opposition.
Applicants instituted as Party Respondents in the Public Interest Litigation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 56 OF 2008
IN
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 57 OF 2008
Jayant Vasantrao Ghosalkar and others
).. Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others
).. Respondents
And
Sadanant Gaikwad and others Applicants/
)..
Intervenors
Mr Sachin Dhakephalkar for the Applicants. Mr R G Ketkar i/b Mr S M Sabrad for the Petitioners. Mr P M Patil, Assistant Government Pleader, for Respondent Nos.1 to 4.
Mr G H Keluskar for Respondent No.5. Mr V A Thorat i/b Mr Niranjan Mogre for Respondent No.6
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C. J. & S. A. BOBDE, J. DATED: 16TH OCTOBER 2008 .
P.C.
This is a Civil Application taken out by the Applicants for impleading them as party Respondents in the present Public Interest Litigation. There is no serious opposition to this Civil Application on behalf of non-applicants. Hence, Civil Application allowed in terms of
-2-
prayer clause (a). Applicants be impleaded as party Respondents in the present Public Interest Litigation. Civil Application disposed of accordingly.
CHIEF JUSTICE
S. A. BOBDE, J.
Sadanant Gaikwad and others
The State of Maharashtra and others
S. A. Bobde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
