A PIL under Original Civil Jurisdiction was dismissed as withdrawn by the Petitioner's counsel at the Bombay High Court.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
P.I.L. No.87 of 2007.
Chetan Suresh Shinde ..Petitioners
versus
State of Maharashtra
& Others ..Respondents
Mr.Niwas Kambli i/b. A.M.Saraogi for the Petitioner
Mr.G.W. Mattos A.G.P. for the State
Ms. S. Ajithkumar for the B.M.C.
Coram : Swatanter Kumar, C.J. &
J.P.Devadhar, J.
Dated : 17th January, 2008
P.C.
1. The learned Counsel appearing for the
petitioner wishes to withdraw the petition.
2. Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
( Chief Justice.)
(J.P.Devadhar, J.)
Chetan Suresh Shinde
State of Maharashtra
Swatanter Kumar
J.P. Devadhar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court