Disposal of a writ petition seeking alternate accommodation. The respondents undertook to pass an appropriate order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1420 OF 2007
Shri Viral Suresh Salot ..Petitioner.
V/s.
Mumbai Mahanagar Regional Development
Authority & Ors. ..Respondents.
Mr.Sunil Singh for petitioner.
Mr.Pradeep Jadhav, A.G.P. for State.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J.AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, J.
DATED : 16TH JANUARY, 2008.
P.C. :-
1. Learned counsel appearing for respondents
submits that they will consider the representation of
the present petitioner and pass appropriate order as to
whether the petitioner is or is not entitled to an
alternate accommodation as per the Rules.
2. Writ petition is disposed of with no order
as to costs.
CHIEF JUSTICE
J.P.DEVADHAR, J.
Shri Viral Suresh Salot
Mumbai Mahanagar Regional Development Authority
S Watanter Kumar
J P Devadhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court