The Public Interest Litigation filed by the petitioner was dismissed by the High Court of Bombay as it has become infructuous and does not survive.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICITON
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.125 OF 2007
Nitu Vishnu Dhone .. Petitioner.
Versus
State of Maharashtra & Others .. Respondents.
Mr.Khandeparkat i/by Smt.Shilpa A. Joshi for the
petitioner.
Mr.V.P. Malvankar, G.P. for respondent Nos.1 and
2.
Mr.R.R. Salvi for respondent Nos.3 to 6.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. &
J.P. DEVADHAR, J.
DATED : 17th January, 2008
P.C. :
1. Counsel appearing for the petitioner states
that this petition does not survive.
2. The writ petition is dismissed having become
infructuous.
CHIEF JUSTICE
J.P. DEVADHAR, J.
Nitu Vishnu Dhone
State of Maharashtra
Swatanter Kumar
J.P. Devadhar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court