Court granted permission to withdraw the writ and contempt petition, dismissing it as withdrawn. Counsel sought permission due to the petition becoming infructuous.
Permission to withdraw granted; contempt petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 222 OF 2008 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 55 OF 2008
Mahesh Verma ..... ...... ......Petitioner V/s The Addl. Commr. Konkan Dvn., Mumbai & Ors. ......Respondents.
Mr.Anurag Jain, Adv. For the petitioner.
CORAM: A.P.DESHPANDE, J. DATED: 28th AUGUST 2008.
PC:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition has
become infructuous hence seeks permission to withdraw the petition.
Permission granted. Contempt petition dismissed as withdrawn.
Mahesh Verma
The Addl. Commr. Konkan Dvn., Mumbai & Ors.
A.P. DESHPANDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
