A single-paragraph order restoring a writ petition after the petitioner complied via affidavit. The court cautioned the petitioner regarding future prosecution and listed the petition for admission.
Petition restored on terms of compensatory cost for future non-prosecution; listed for admission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 360 of 2007 In WRIT PETITION NO. 2770 OF 2007 Naresh J. Sanjani .. Petitioner V/s The State of Maharashtra and Ors.. Respondents Mr.S.U.Shukla for the Petitioner Mr.P.G.Sawant,AGP for Respondent/State CORAM : SHRI J.N.PATEL & SHRI K.K.TATED, JJ. DATE : 5th August 2008. P.C.: 1. For the reasons stated in the affidavit in reply in support of Notice of Motion, the petition is restored. 2. We make it clear that in future if the petitioner fails to prosecute his petition, the Court will impose compensatory cost. 3. Rule is made absolute in above terms. 4. Petition be listed for admission in due course. (J.N. Patel, J.) (K.K. Tated, J)
Naresh J. Sanjani
The State of Maharashtra
J.N. Patel
K.K. Tated
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
