The High Court condensed a 30-day delay for filing an appeal and directed office processing for admission. Both sides were heard.
Delay of 30 days condoned; office directed to number the appeal and process it for admission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HVN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2242 OF 2008
IN
APPEAL (L) NO. 311 OF 2008
IN
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 4542 OF 2006
IN
SUIT NO. 1173 OF 2004
Suresh Shivram Palekar ... Appellant
Versus
K.Y. Annapoorni & Ors. ... Respondents
Mrs. V.V. Thorat for the Appellant.
Mr. D’lima i/by M/s. D’lima & Associates for
Respondents.
CORAM: S.B. MHASE &
PRASANNA B. VARALE,JJ.
DATED: JULY 25, 2008
P.C.
. Heard both sides.
. This is a motion for condonation of delay of 30
days. For the reasons stated in the affidavit, we
find that there is sufficient case made out. Hence,
delay condoned. Office is directed to number the
appeal and process it for admission. Motion
disposed of.
(PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.)(S.B. MHASE,J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 30 days in filing the appeal was condonable.
Suresh Shivram Palekar
K.Y. Annapoorni & Ors.
S.B. MHASE
PRASANNA B. VARALE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court