Disposed
Chelamma Balkrishna Iyer v. Hema Rohit Dharamshi
Bombay HCNMA/1784/2008
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HVN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1784 OF 2008
IN
APPEAL (L) NO. 165 OF 2008
IN
SUIT NO. 1186 OF 1995
Chelamma Balkrishna Iyer ... Appellant
Versus
Hema Rohit Dharmshi ... Respondent
Mr.J.S. Kini i/by Suresh Dubey for the Appellant.
CORAM: S.B. MHASE &
PRASANNA B. VARALE,JJ.
DATED: JULY 25, 2008
P.C.
. Heard.
. The learned counsel for the appellant has filed
affidavit of service. Inspite of that the
Respondent is absent. There is delay of 28 days in
filing the appeal. For the reasons stated in the
affidavit, we condone the delay. Office is directed
to number the appeal and process it for admission.
Motion disposed of.
(PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.)(S.B. MHASE,J.)
Chelamma Balkrishna Iyer
Hema Rohit Dharmshi
S.B. MHASE
PRASANNA B. VARALE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court