Allowed

Supplementary Foods India Limited v. Maharashtra State Financial Corporation

Bombay HC25 Jul 2008NMA/1194/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Bombay disposed of a company petition and appeal. Condoning the delay of 26 days due to the respondent's absence and sufficient grounds stated in the affidavit, the Court ordered the office to number the appeal and process it for admission.

What did the court decide?

The delay of 26 days was condoned; the appeal was numbered and ordered to be processed for admission.

Supplementary Foods India Limited Vs Maharashtra State… — Company and Corporate | Bombay HC (2008)

¶1

HVN

¶2

 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1194 OF 2008
 IN
 APPEAL (L) NO. 48 OF 2008
 IN
 COMPANY PETITION NO. 99 OF 1997

¶3

 Supplementary Foods India Limited.. Appellant

¶4

 Versus

¶5

 Maharashtra State Financial
 Corporation ... Respondent

¶6

 Mr. Pankaj Kawali i/by A.C. Mahimkar for the
 Appellants.

¶7

CORAM: S.B. MHASE &
PRASANNA B. VARALE,JJ.
DATED: JULY 25, 2008
P.C.

¶8

 . Heard.

¶9

 . The leaned counsel for the Applicant states that
 this is an application to condone the delay of 26
 days. He states that notice was served on
 respondents and the respondent is absent inspite of
 service of notice. He undertakes to file affidavit
 of service with acknowledgements. Therefore, the
 matter is proceeded with. We find that as a result
 of the non-traverse of the pleadings, the grounds
 stated in the affidavit makes out sufficient ground
 for condonation of delay. The delay for 26 days

¶10

 condoned. Office is directed to number the appeal
 and process it for admission. The appellant shall
 make any compliance in respect of the affidavit

¶11

 along with acknowledgment by Monday.

¶12

 (PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.)(S.B. MHASE,J.)

Supplementary Foods India Limited v. Maharashtra State Financial Corporation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Supplementary Foods India Limited v. Maharashtra State Financial Corporation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jamuna Darshan Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd. and 2 Ors. Vs M/S J.Mc. and Meghani Builders and 6 Ors.

Jai Veera Darshan Co-Op Housing Soc.Limited and Anr. Vs Mrs Kusumgauri Himatlal Jani and 8 Ors.

Mr. Shekhar Shah Vs M/S Maharashtra Telephone Nigam Ltd. and 2 Ors.

Supplementrary Fodds India Limited Vs Raman K. Das

Chelamma Balkrishna Iyer Vs Hema Rohit Dharamshi

Suresh Shivram Palekar Vs K.Y.Annapoorni and 6 Ors.