The Letters Patent Appeal was disposed of as withdrawn by the appellant without pressing the appeal. Liberty was granted to avail appropriate remedy as permissible by law.
Liberty granted to appellant to avail appropriate remedy and to mention matter for extension of time before the Single Judge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.414 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6519 OF 2008
Geeta Naraindas Shivdasani Vs.
Niraj T. Sharma and others
... Appellant
.. Respondents
Mr. K.T. Kukreja i/by Mr. Divang H. Shah for the appellant. Mr. P.S. Dani i/by Mr. S.G. Karandikar for the respondent No.1.
CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & S.A. BOBDE, J.
DATE : 2ND DECEMBER, 2008
P.C.:
The learned counsel appearing for the appellant, in view of the objection raised as to the maintainability of the present appeal, does not press this appeal and seeks liberty to avail appropriate remedy as permissible to him in accordance with law. He further states that liberty may be granted to the appellant to mention the matter for extension of time before the same learned Single Judge
who had passed the order dated 21st October, 2008. Appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.
CHIEF JUSTICE
S.A. BOBDE, J.
Geeta Naraindas Shivdasani
Niraj T. Sharma
Swatanter Kumar
S.A. Bobde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
