Allowed
Anjanabi Chandrakant Kamthe and Ors. v. Prith Pal Singh Bharana and Ors.
Bombay HCCAF/5093/2008
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5093 OF 2008
In
FIRST APPEAL (STAMP) NO.19581 OF 2002
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes,Office Memoranda of
Coram,appearances,Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and Registrar’s
orders
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ms Pallavi N. Dabholkar for the
applicants.
CORAM : S.A. BOBDE, J.
DATE : DECEMBER 1, 2008.
Heard.
In view of the statements made on
oath in the Civil Application, the Civil
Application is allowed in terms of prayer
clauses (a) and (b).
S.A. BOBDE, J.
S.A. Bobde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court