Allowed
Jaysing Bhausaheb Darvan v. Ashok @Subhash Dnyandeo Darvan and Ors.
Bombay HCCAS/1027/2008
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1027 OF 2008
In
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.528 OF 2007 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.744/2002
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes,Office Memoranda of
Coram,appearances,Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and Registrar’s
orders
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr.A.M.Kulkarni for the applicants.
None present for the respondents.
CORAM : S.A. BOBDE, J.
DATE : DECEMBER 1, 2008.
In view of the uncontroverted
averments, the Civil Application is
allowed in terms of prayer clauses (b)
and (c). Amendment be carried out within
a period of two weeks.
S.A. BOBDE, J.
S.A. Bobde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court