Coordinating Bench allowed two first appeals, relying on a Division Bench judgment from 2004, finding no dispute to facts covered in that precedent.
First appeals allowed with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
FIRST APPEAL NO. 105 OF 1998, 106 of 1998 & FIRST APPEAL NO. 16 OF 1999
FIRST APPEAL NO. 105 OF 1998 & FIRST APPEAL NO. 106 of 1998
Special Land Acquisition Officer & Anr. .... Appellants V/s Shri Laximan Gopal Dessai (dec.) by LR's & Ors. ... Respondents AND FIRST APPEAL NO. 16 OF 1999 Special Land Acquisition Officer & Anr. .... Appellants V/s Miss Seema Bhiso Naik Gaonkar ... Respondent
Mr. S. Vahidulla, Addl. Govt. Advocate of the Appellants. Mr. Shivan Dessai, Advocate for the Respondents.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & N.A. BRITTO, J.
DATE : 20th NOVEMBER, 2008
ORAL JUDGMENT:
There is no dispute to the fact that controversy involved in the present appeal is clearly covered by the Division Bench Judgment of this Court dated 29/06/2004 passed in First Appeal No. 89/1999 along with Cross Objections No. 3/2000.
dismissed. Adopting the same reasoning and being the judgment of coordinating Bench, we with respect allow the above first appeals with no order
as to costs.
CHIEF JUSTICE
JUDGE
NH/-
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
First Appeal No. 89/1999 along with Cross Objections No. 3/2000Followed¶9
Special Land Acquisition Officer & Anr.
Shri Laximan Gopal Dessai & Ors.
Miss Seema Bhiso Naik Gaonkar
Swatantar Kumar
N.A. Britto
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
