The Bombay High Court dismissed Company Petition No.376 of 1999 due to non-compliance with prior court directions issued on 25th February, 2008, triggering a self-operative order.
Petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY PETITION NO.376 OF 1999
---------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Memo- Court’s or
randa of Coram,appearances Judge’s orders
Court’s orders or directions
and Registrar’s order.
---------------------------------------------------
None present.
CORAM: S.C.Dharmadhikari,J.
DATE : 12th June, 2008.
P.C.
1. None present for both
petitioner and respondent.
2. There is no compliance with the
directions issued by this Court on
25th February, 2008. In these
circumstances, the self-operative
order comes into effect. The petition
is therefore dismissed for want of
prosecution.
(S.C.Dharmadhikari, J)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether Company Petition No.376 of 1999 stands dismissed for non-compliance with court directions.
Petitioner
Respondent
S.C.Dharmadhikari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court