The Single Judge allowed the withdrawal of a Company Application filed under the Indian Companies Act, dismissing it as withdrawn and vacating any interlocutory orders.
Leave to withdraw the Company Application granted; application dismissed as withdrawn; ad-interim orders vacated; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY APPLICATION NO.819 OF 2008
IN
COMPANY PETITION NO.437 OF 1992
---------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Memo- Court’s or
randum of Coram,appearance. Judge’s orders
Court’s orders or directions
and Prothonotary’s orders.
---------------------------------------------------
Mr.B.B.Parekh for applicant.
CORAM: S.C.Dharmadhikari,J.
DATE : 12th June, 2008.
P.C.
1. The learned advocate appearing
for the applicant seeks leave to
withdraw Company Application as he has
instructions to withdraw the
application. Leave granted.
Application is therefore dismissed as
withdrawn. Ad-interim order, if any,
to stand vacated. No costs.
(S.C.Dharmadhikari, J)
Applicant
SC Dharmadhikari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court