Criminal Application filed for intervention in a pending Criminal Appeal. The unnamed High Court of Bombay allowed the intervention for the original complainant and ordered expedited hearing of the appeal.
Application for intervention allowed; applicant permitted to intervene; hearing expedited.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 737 OF 2008
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 339 OF 1996
Smt.Ruksana Rashid Shaikh ...Applicant/
Intervenor
vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents
None for the applicant.
Mr.Rajesh More, APP for the State.
CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J.
DATED : OCTOBER 3, 2008
P.C. :-
1. None appears on behalf of the applicant.
2. This is an application for intervention filed by
the applicant. The applicant is the original
complainant. The application for intervention is
allowed. The applicant shall be permitted to intervene
in Criminal Appeal No.339 of 1996. Hearing of the
appeal is expedited.
3. This Application is disposed of.
(V.M. KANADE, J.)
Smt. Ruksana Rashid Shaikh
The State of Maharashtra
V.M. KANADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court