Siddhu @ Siddharth Ramesh Janmejay v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Bombay, Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction, rejected the bail application and the criminal application filed by the appellant, who was convicted for transporting spurious drugs under IPC and Drugs and Cosmetics Act provisions, holding no case for bail. The appeal hearing was expedited.
What did the court decide?
Application was rejected; bail was not granted; appeal hearing expedited.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 508 OF 2008
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 440 OF 2008
Siddhu alias Siddharth Ramesh Janmejay ...Applicant/
Orig.Accused No.1
vs.
The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
Mr.R.D. Suryawanshi for the Applicant.
Rajesh More, APP for the State.
CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J.
DATED : OCTOBER 3, 2008
P.C. :-
1. Heard Counsel for the applicant.
2. The applicant is convicted for the offence under
Section 468 of the IPC and sentenced to suffer RI for 7
years. He is convicted for the offence under Section
17-B(a), (d) and (e) read with Section 27 of the Drugs
and Cosmetics Act and under Section 18(i)(c) read with
Section 27 of the same Act. The trial Court has held
that the prosecution has established that the applicant
was transporting spurious drugs. PW 18 Satyanarayan
Kurma, Manager of Medibios Laboratories Pvt.Ltd.has
submitted that on taking physical inspection, he found
that the drug was spurious/duplicate and the packing
material and label were spurious/duplicate. This fact
has been further confirmed by chemical analysis vide
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail is maintainable for an applicant convicted under Section 468 IPC and the Drugs and Cosmetics Act where the facts are established.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Siddhu alias Siddharth Ramesh Janmejay
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
V.M. KANADE
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court