This order was delivered on the third bail application. The court held there was no change of circumstances and refused to grant bail, though it opened the possibility of applying for parole later.
None; bail refused, but applicant may apply for parole.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(-1-)
MGN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE, CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.291 OF 2006
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.637 OF 2003
Raju Subbarao Mohite.....Applicant
Vs.
State of Maharashtra.....Respondent
None for the Applicant
Mr. A.J. Dedhia, APP for State.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ.
DATED: 10th April,2008
P.C.:
. Record will indicate that the bail
applications filed by the applicant were rejected
firstly on 1st February, 2003 and the second
application on 6th December, 2004. This is third
application on the ground that there is sickness in
the family and for that purpose bail be granted.
2. In our opinion there is no change of
circumstances. It will be open to the applicant to
apply for parole and this order will not stand in
the way of the Applicant. Office to communicate
this order to the Appellant who is in jail.
(SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted on the ground of sickness in the family when there is no change of circumstances.
Raju Subbarao Mohite
State of Maharashtra
F.I. Rebello
V.K. Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court