Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition to pursue remedy before a competent forum. The court disposed of the writ petition as withdrawn with liberty to pursue remedy if available in law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
Writ Petition No. 923/2007
(Tukaram Laxman Rekhate & another VERSUS The Commissioner, Amravati Division & others )
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
Mr. Saboo, counsel for the petitioners. Mr. Kothale, counsel for the R-4 & 5.
Mr. Sonak, Assistant Government Pleader for the R-1 to 3.
CORAM : D.D.SINHA AND SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, JJ. DATE : DECEMBER 17, 2007.
Heard Mr. Saboo, the learned counsel for the petitioners.
The counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition in order to pursue the remedy already undertaken before the competent forum.
The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for, if otherwise available in law.
JUDGE
APTE
JUDGE
Tukaram Laxman Rekhate
The Commissioner, Amravati Division
D. D. Sinha
Vasanti A. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
