The Court quashed the FIR and charge-sheet in a criminal case where the petitioner accused and the complainant had amicably settled the dispute and expressed a desire to end hostilities.
FIR No.232 of 2006 and the charge-sheet filed pursuant thereto are quashed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
AJN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.767 OF 2007
Hari Chandra Balkrishna Vichare ... Petitioner Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ... Respondents
Mr. Dinesh B. Ujinwad i/b Mr. C.k. Talekar for the petitioner.
Ms. P.H. Kantharia, A.P.P. for the State.
Mr. K.A. Milavalla for respondent 2.
CORAM : SMT. RANJANA DESAI & D. B. BHOSALE, JJ. DATED : 19TH JUNE, 2007.
P.C.:-
AJN
persons have reached an amicable solution and decided to end any kind of hostilities towards each other. The learned counsel for the parties state that in view of the settlement, the FIR in C.R. No.232 of 2006 be quashed.
[SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.]
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the FIR and charge-sheet can be quashed upon the parties reaching an amicable settlement.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
B.S. Joshi vs. State of Haryana & Anr.Relied on¶16
B.S. Joshi vs. State of Haryana & Anr., 2003 ALL MR (Cri) 1162 (S.C)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Hari Chandra Balkrishna Vichare
State of Maharashtra
Ranjana Desai
D. B. Bhosale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
