Petition filed by original complainant disposed of as it has withdrawn the complaint; all connected applications also disposed of, no substantive legal question addressed.
Petition and all connected applications disposed of as it has withdrawn the complaint.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.64 OF 2007 IN W.P.NO.186 OF 2006
WITH
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.145 OF 2006 IN W.P.NO.186 OF 2006
WITH
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.186 OF 2006
------------------------------------:----------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders.
coram, appearances, Court’s orders :
or directions and Registrar’s :
orders. :
------------------------------------:-----------------------------------
Mr.Dilip Shukla i/b M/s.P.V.Nichani & Co. for
the petitioner.
Mrs.S.D.Shinde APP for the State.
CORAM: SMT.RANJANA DESAI &
D.B.BHOSALE, JJ.
DATED: 18TH JUNE, 2007.
P.C.:
. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner
and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. This petition is filed by the original
complainant. The learned counsel for the
petitioner states that the petitioner/original
complainant has withdrawn the complaint. In
view of this the petition does not survives.
The petition is disposed of. All applications
are also disposed of.
(D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (SMT.RANJANA DESAI, J.)
ORIGONAL COMPLAINANT
STATE
RANJANA DESAI
D.B.BHOSALE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court