The High Court dismissed a fresh writ petition filed by a teacher regarding a promotion grievance. The petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner was absent when the matter was called out.
null
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
MGN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE
WRIT PETITION NO.6285 of 2006
Smt. Farida Saddruddin Velani .......Petitioners
Versus
The State (Union Territory of Daman) & Ors.
.......Respondents
None for the Petitioner
Mr. Girish Kulkarni with Ms. Swati Deshpande for respondent Nos. 1 to 3.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &
S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ.
DATED : 21ST FEBRUARY 2007
P.C.
. None present for the petitioner.
| 2. | Earlier | the petitioner had approac | hed Central | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Administrative | T | ribunal by |
Original Ap |
plication | No.181 | of |
| 2002. | In | the Original |
Application the |
grievance | of | the |
| petitioner | was | about the pr |
omotion o |
f one |
Shri | B.M. |
| Locadia, | Teacher | Grade I (Hin |
di). It |
was the |
contention |
of |
| the petitio |
ner that |
she was q |
ualified and |
ought t |
o have |
been |
| promoted. | Tha | t application c |
ame to be |
rejected | by | order |
| dated | 11th | December, 2002. |
The | petitioner | thereafter | filed |
| Writ | Petition | before this Court |
which was |
numbered | as |
Writ |
| Petition N |
o.841 of |
2006. When |
the matter |
was | called out |
the |
| petitioner | was | not present on |
18th April, |
2006. | Apart | from |
| that this |
Court | noted that Lo |
cadia was |
appointed | in the |
year |
| 1995 | and | the petitioner had |
approached |
the Court |
in |
2006. |
Considering the delay in approaching the Tribunal and as
there was no explanation the petition was dismissed.
the matter is called out none present for the petitioner.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
( F.I. REBELLO , J)
( S.J.VAZIFDAR, J)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be allowed or dismissed for non-prosecution
Whether the petitioner presented herself for the hearing of the fresh petition
Smt. Farida Saddruddin Velani
The State (Union Territory of Daman)
F.I. Rebello
S.J. Vazifdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
