Disposed
Sheetal Ashok Panwalkar v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCCAW/467/2007
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
CIVIL APPLICATION (ST.) NO.3317 OF 2007
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.5851 OF 2006
--------------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s orders
of Coram, appearances, Court’s .
orders or directions and .
Registrar’s orders .
--------------------------------------------------------------
Mr.N.V. Pradhan i/b Mr.Mahesh Pradhan
for the Petitioner. .
Mr.C.R. Sonawane, AGP for Respondent
Nos.1 to 3. .
Ms.Preetam P. Tendulkar for Respondent
Nos.5 to 8. .
Mr.N.V. Bandiwadekar for Respondent
No.7.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &
S.J. VAZIFDAR, JJ.
DATED : 20TH FEBRUARY, 2007.
P.C.:
1.Heard parties.
2.The Civil Application is made
absolute in terms of prayer (a). The
amendment to be carried out within two
weeks from today.
3.The CivilApplication is
accordingly disposed of.
(S.J.VAZIFDAR, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)
Petitioner
Respondents
F.I. Rebello
S.J. Vazifdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court