Petitioner challenged an order of the Divisional Cast Certificate Scrutiny Committee rejecting his claim. The court held that the committee's order was reasoned and a possible view, seeing no reason to interfere, rejecting the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.541 OF 2007
Shaikh Asif Latif son of Shaikh
Latif Ambhirbhai @ Amirbhai.
...Petitioner.
vs.
1.Divisional Cast Certificate
Scrutiny Committee, Nasik Div.
and others.
...Respondents.
Mr.R.G.Ketkar, for Petitioner.
Mr.V.P.Malwankar, AGP for Respondent no.1.
Mr.S.B.Shetye, for Respondent no.2.
Mr.M.L.Patil, for Respondent nos.3 and 4.
CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH &
V.M.KANADE, JJ.
DATED: 20th NOVEMBER,2007.
2
P.C .:-
1.Heard the learned Counsel appearing for
petitioner at length. Perused the record. The
order of the Scrutiny committee is a reasoned
order. The documents relied on by the petitioner
are considered by the scrutiny committee. The
view taken by the scrutiny committee is a
possible view. We see no reason to interfere with
the order, hence, the writ petition is rejected.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the high court should interfere with the reasoned order of the Scrutiny Committee regarding the petitioner's cast certificate.
Shaikh Asif Latif
Divisional Cast Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nasik Div.
others
D.K.Deshmukh
V.M.Kanade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court