The High Court rejected the appellant's appeal regarding an alleged employer-employee relationship. Holding that the appellant failed to prove employment due to lack of written or oral contract evidence, the court dismissed the appeal and disposed of a consequential civil application.
Appeal rejected; Civil Application No.30 of 2007 disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.253 OF 2007 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3460 OF 2006
Vishnulal B. Kori
..... Appellant.
V/s
M/s. Luftansa German Airlines ..... Respondents.
Mr. Dushyant Purekar for the appellant.
CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH & V.M. KANADE, JJ.
DATE : 19th November, 2007.
P.C.:
2
Company. Hence, there is no reason to interfere with the impugned order.
(D.K. DESHMUKH, J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to interfere with the impugned order holding that the appellant failed to prove that he was in the employment of the respondent company.
Whether the civil application pending before the court survives after the disposal of the letters patent appeal.
Vishnulal B. Kori
M/s. Luftansa German Airlines
D.K. DESHMUKH
V.M. KANADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
